Latest News

In a recent article, the Financial Times outlines how Big Tech’s move into the medical industry raises health privacy fears for citizens around the world whose healthcare providers team up with the Masters of the Universe.

Curious Reporter 4 months ago 2 min read

Financial Times: Big Tech’s Move into Healthcare Industry Creates Medical Privacy Fears

In a later article, the Financial Times traces how Big Tech’s move into the restorative industry raises wellbeing security fears for citizens around the world whose healthcare suppliers group up with the Masters of the Universe.

The Financial Times reports in a later article that as huge tech firms such as Amazon make a move into the therapeutic world, numerous stress approximately the protection suggestions of tech mammoths having get to to users’ therapeutic records.

Tech mammoth Amazon as of late declared it would be propelling its claim drug store which guaranteed 80 percent rebates on medicines, recommending that the retailer sees an opportunity in not realizing quick benefits, but or maybe persuading clients to sign up in arrange to pick up get to to a much more important long term venture — client information.

The Financial Times writes:

Health data has been described as an “open frontier” that tech companies are positioning themselves to exploit. The opportunity goes beyond the health information that should be protected by doctor-patient confidentiality. More vulnerable is health-related data gathered outside the doctor-patient relationship via training and fitness devices as well as features in digital personal assistants — such as Amazon’s Echo smart speaker.

The contention that wellbeing information needs assurance is obvious. Any commercialisation of individual information — indeed information given by the clients themselves — should to begin with address privacy and planning reason.

Take the fever for wellness self-tracking. When the US Federal Trade Commission tried 12 apps and two wearable gadgets in 2014, it found that they transmitted information to no less than 76 undisclosed third parties. No ponder Google was willing to pay $2.1bn for Fitbit in November 2019.

Concerns have also been raised about the privacy terms of the third-party apps that tech groups integrate into their home personal assistant devices and mobile phone interfaces, often to gather health-related data. The way in which these systems collect data is not always apparent to users, as illustrated in the cases revealed last year of various menstruation apps that were sharing information about women’s sexual lives with Facebook. This sharing was sometimes initiated even before the user agreed to the app’s privacy terms.

Breitbart News detailed in November 2019 that Google had furtively gotten to the restorative records of tens of millions of individuals in 21 states after collaborating with wellbeing frameworks.