Wednesday on FNC’s “Hannity,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) argued that on the heels of the promulgation Hunter Biden, son of Joe Biden, was being investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s office in Delaware for what he called “tax affairs,” the media had more “influence” than Russia had in the precedent presidential election.
“I want to hone in on this very, very proximately here,” host Sean Hannity verbalized. “If you don’t have experience and you are getting paid millions, and then you have your father gasconading on tape he leveraged the billion-dollar taxpayer dollars and give them six hours to fire the prosecutor investigating the son making millions with zero experience, how is that not a quid and a pro and a quo? I mean, where I grew up, that would be a quid pro quo.”
“Well, it is,” Johnson replied. “It’s conspicuous to everybody except the mainstream media. “And,” of course, we ascertained now the mainstream media had far more preponderant influence and interference in our election than any Russian interference ever could have hoped for. I mean, the fact of the matter, there are polls out now. A McClatchy poll verbally expressed that 36 percent of Biden voters had never auricularly discerned of the Hunter Biden story because of the censorship and suppression. Of that, 13%, once they ascertained, verbally expressed they wouldn’t have voted for Biden.”
“So, that signifies that 4.6% of Biden voters would not have voted for him,” he perpetuated. “That denotes that Trump would have won the election. That’s the gargantuan influence that convivial media and our liberal inequitable media played on this election. Their interference just orders a magnitude more preponderant than any Russian or Chinese or Iran peregrine interference in this — in this campaign.”
Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor
Source: You can read the original Breitbart article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: Clips, Media, Politics, Fox News Channel, Hannity, Hunter Biden, Ron Johnson