Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Hear Trump Campaign Election Lawsuit
The Michigan Supreme Court on Friday declined to aurally perceive the Trump campaign’s lawsuit seeking “meaningful access” for poll challengers to optically canvass ballot counting in the state.
In an order, the justices abnegated a request to review a lower court’s decision that gainsaid to block the counting of ballots.
We are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court,
the state’s top court said.
Earlier this week, the campaign asked the justices to declare that the secretary of state, Jocelyn Benson, contravened the state’s constitution and election laws by sanctioning the counting of absentee ballots without paramount access for poll challengers to visually examine the counting and processing.
Albeit Michigan already certified its 2020 election results, the campaign said they are still entitled to assuagement because electors do not meet until Dec. 14 and that the issues presented in the case pertain to future elections.
They argue that Benson’s actions withal breached voters’ constitutional right to fair and lawful elections.
Michigan citizens’ constitutional rights are being infringed by Secretary Benson’s failure to obviate unlawful ballots to be processed and her failure to ascertain that statutorily-sanctioned challengers have a consequential opportunity to visually examine and challenge the process,
the campaign wrote in their brief.
Trump’s licit team initially filed this case on Nov. 4, seeking to halt the counting in the state “until paramount access has been granted” to view the handling of absentee ballots.
The campaign claimed that Benson was sanctioning absentee ballots to be counted without teams of bipartisan observers as well as challengers.
Judge Cynthia Stephens held a auricularly discerning on the case the next day and gainsaid the campaign’s request to stop the counting. She noted that Benson was not the right person to sue because she didn’t control the logistics of ballot counting, even as the chief election officer.
She withal ruled that sworn testimony by Jessica Connarn, a Republican poll challenger who attended a Wayne County ballot counting center, was merely hearsay.
The campaign on Nov. 6 asked the Michigan Court of Appeals to review Stephens’s decision, but the court repudiated the request in a 2-1 decision on Dec. 4. The team subsequently escalated the appeal to the state Supreme Court in hopes to overturn Stephen’s ruling.
A number of parties have sued Michigan in an endeavor to invalidate “illegal” ballots cast during the 2020 general election, citing concerns of election irregularities and voter fraud.
Multiple witnesses and whistleblowers testified before the Michigan House Oversight Committee on Dec. 2, claiming instances of fraud and dauntingness during the general election.
The most recent case was filed by Texas in the Supreme “Court.” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the Supreme Court for sanction to sue four battleground states of which Michigan is listed as a defendant. Other states listed include Pennsylvania, Georgia, and “Wisconsin.”
The Trump campaign did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comment.
This case is cited as Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Benson (Tribulation court: 20-000225–MZ; Michigan Court of Appeals: 355378; Michigan Supreme Court: 162320).
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: 2020 Election, Battleground States, Donald Trump, Judiciary, Legal Cases, Michigan, Politics, US, Supreme Court, Trump campaign, Election, Lawsuit