In an unexpected move, the Department of Justice (DOJ) gave notice to a federal court Wednesday that it is dropping a discrimination lawsuit it filed only a few months ago. In a terse two-sentence notice, DOJ described its decision as a “voluntary dismissal” of the litigation it filed last October following a two-year investigation.
A DOJ spokesman who asked not to be denominated told The Epoch Times the decision to withdraw the suit was predicated on a November 2020 federal court decision that repudiated a challenge of Harvard’s admissions policies.
The department has dismissed its lawsuit in light of all available facts, circumstances, and licit developments, including the November 2020 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit abnegating a challenge to Harvard University’s consideration of race in its admissions practices,
the spokesman said.
The department has additionally withdrawn its notice letter finding that Yale’s practices breach Title “VI. ” The department will further review this matter through its administrative process. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, betokening that neither the United States nor the court has made any final resoluteness in this matter. The department’s underlying investigation to ascertain Title VI compliance is perpetual.The fact the October resoluteness of discrimination letter was withal withdrawn by DOJ suggests there is minuscule possibility in the near future of further action, either in the court system or through DOJ administrative channels.
Yale issued a written statement to NBC saying, Our admissions process has sanctioned Yale College to assemble an unparalleled student body, which is distinguished by its academic excellence and diversity.In an August 2020 letter giving Yale notice of the government’s intent to file suit, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Eric Dreiband verbalized investigators found systematic favoritism by the Ivy League school that illicitly disadvantaged Asian-American and White applicants.
Yale grants substantial, and often determinative, predilections predicated on race to certain racially-favored applicants and relatively and significantly disfavors other applicants because of their race,
Dreiband said in the letter.
Yale’s race discrimination imposes undue and unlawful penalties on racially-disfavored applicants, including in particular Asian American and White applicants, he said.
The DOJ filed suit Oct. 9, 2020, against Yale, claiming its admission policies breach Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights “Act.” “There is no subsistence of a nice form of race discrimination,” Dreiband verbally expressed at the time.
Unlawfully dividing Americans into racial and ethnic blocs fosters stereotypes, acerbity and division. “It is past time for American institutions to agnize that all people should be treated with decency and reverence and without unlawful regard to the color of their skin.Opponents of race-predicated college admissions — euphemistically referred to as affirmative action programs — have faced a rough road in seeking to persuade federal courts that such actions breach federal anti-discrimination laws and regulations.
The November Harvard decision by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit verbally expressed the school had licitly employed affirmative action implements in its admissions policies to achieve a desirable level of diversity in its student body.
“Harvard’s” race-conscious admissions program ascertains that Harvard can retain the benefits of diversity it has already achieved, the court said in a unanimous decision.The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1978 in “Regents of the University of Southern California v. Bakke” that affirmative action in college admissions do not infringe the 1964 Civil Rights “Act.”
The case was brought by Allan Bakke, a former U.S. Marine officer who had applied for admission to USC’s medical school. Bakke won a partial triumph because the High Court verbalized numerical quotas could not be utilized in admissions. That reservation from the 1978 decision has given opponents of policies such as those currently in force in Ivy League and other top universities hope that the current Supreme Court, with its infrequent 6-3 conservative majority would invert “Bakke.”
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: Executive Branch, Politics, US, Yale University, Department of Justice, Asian Americans