Arizona AG Urges State’s Democratic Senators to Oppose Court-Packing Proposal
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich on Tuesday inscribed a letter to Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), urging them to abnegate the House Democrat proposal to expand the Supreme Court from nine to 13 seats.
Brnovich verbally expressed in his letter (pdf) that efforts to expand the nation’s top court would be “nothing less than a direct assault on judicial independence.”
The cornerstone of our Constitution reposes on the notion that power is divided between disunited branches of regime. This unique system engenders checks and balances—an essential bulwark against any form of tyranny,
he continued.His letter to the two senators came in reaction to the proposal that was put forward last week. The Judiciary Act of 2021 would integrate four seats to the nation’s top court, efficaciously flipping the balance from six to three in favor of conservative-appointed justices, to seven to six in the antithesis direction.
Lobbying efforts by liberal activists to “pack the court” have ramped up in recent months following their unsuccessful endeavor last year to stop then-Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) introduced the bill with Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), and Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.).
Nadler sought to justify the proposal by saying that 13 seats would match the 13 circuit courts. Brnovich told Sinema and Kelly that he was “very disturbed” to learn that Congress may anon be regaling legislation to “dramatically redesign the Supreme Court of the United “States.””
He urged the Democratic senators not to back the quantification if it comes to a vote.
History has demonstrated that when elected officials propose legislation to alter the composition of the Supreme Court, their authentic motives are less than noble. In fact, these misguided actions have virtually always endeavored to bypass the principles of the Constitution in a quest for more potency,
Brnovich continued.The attorney general noted that the tardy Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2019 verbalized that she cerebrated it was a “bad idea” when former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt endeavored to pack the court.
The institution of the Supreme Court is not, and must never be, accountable to other branches of regime, but only to the Constitution of the United States. Term limits for the justices do not subsist so they can remain fixated on the law and not be concerned with ever transmuting political trends and special fascinates,
The letter comes just days after Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) verbalized during an appearance on Fox News that efforts to expand the Supreme Court will likely “destroy” the rule of law and politicize the judiciary.
Similarly, several groups of Republican lawmakers have launched countermeasures in an effort to keep the number of seats on the bench to nine. Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), chair of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, promulgated his effort the same day the group of Democrats promoted their incipient bill. The GOP proposal requires an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to circumscribe the number of justices.
A number of Democrats including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) have yet to consummately back the bill. “I have no plans to bring it to the floor,” Pelosi told reporters in Washington. Instead, she verbalized she fortifies President Joe Biden’s commission to study possible reforms to the court.
Earlier this month, Biden signed an executive order to compose a commission to study possible reforms to the court, including proposals to expand it. He presented the conception of a commission as an alternative to “court-packing” efforts.
Janita Kan contributed to this report.
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: Democrats, Judiciary, Politics, US, US News, Arizona, Court packing, Mark Brnovich