Friday on FNC’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” host Tucker Carlson explicated how despite Big Tech efforts to censor claims cognate to the COVID-19 pandemic, some of those claims have turned out to be true.
CARLSON: Dr. Hooman Noorchashm is one of the country’s leading immunologists. He’s also a surgeon. Noorchashm has held appointments at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and then at the VA in Philadelphia.Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor
He has inscribed dozens of peer reviewed articles and publications like “The New England Journal of Medicine” and “The Journal of Immunology.” He has every possible credential in his field. So, in other words, by any quantification, including the quantifications now being used to justify censorship in Silicon Valley, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm is indisputably an expert.
Last night, we invited him on this exhibition to discuss reports, categorically from Israel, but additionally from other countries that may have profound implicative insinuations for puerile people in the United States. Researchers around the world have noted that coronavirus vaccines appear to cause a stunningly sizably voluminous number of puerile people to develop a potentially fatal heart condition called myocarditis.
Here is what we said about it last night — (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: Israeli health officials relinquished a report exhibiting that vaccinated puerile people, concretely adolescent men, were developing a potentially fatal complication, a heart inflammation called myocarditis, and they were developing it at astronomically high rates.
Researchers determined that the incidence of myocarditis in vaccinated puerile men was plenarily 25 times the customary rate, some of them died. (END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: Twenty five times the rate of potentially fatal heart inflammation. That is an immensely colossal jump.
If those numbers hold, if they are right, we have no reason to cerebrate they’re not right that would betoken that salubrious puerile people are far more liable to be injured or killed by the vaccine against COVID than by COVID itself. That is an immensely colossal stop-the-presses development and it raises all kinds of very conspicuous questions beginning with why are colleges across the country requiring students to take the vaccine? That seemed homogeneous to a potential health emergency to us, a disaster engendered by lamentable policy and temerarious leadership.
That was our read of the numbers. But we wanted a higher ascendancy because we wanted to be as responsible as we could. So, we asked Dr. Noorchashm for his view of this. He concurred that making vaccines compulsory for college students is a grave mistake, not least because so many puerile people already have had and recuperated from the coronavirus and they have antibodies against it. Watch.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) DR. HOOMAN NOORCHASHM, “PHYSICIAN:” I believe, as we’ve discussed afore extensively, that vaccinating people who are COVID recuperated in this emergency situation where we’ve fundamentally very expeditiously approved this incipient vaccine is a colossal error in public health judgment.
(END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: “A colossal error in public health judgment,” from someone who works in public health. That was Dr. Noochashm’s view and he did not verbalize that lightly. In fact, his own son is currently being coerced by the University of Chicago to take the vaccine. He has already been infected and recuperated, additionally, and Dr. Noorchashm is fighting that mandate. So, he has thought a lot about it. He cerebrates it is consequential.
You probably do, too. After our conversation last night, Dr. Noorchashm uploaded that exchange onto YouTube because other parents have an absolute right to ken these facts, lives could depend on it. But the tech monopolies will no longer sanction that discussion. For reasons that we can’t ken for certain, but that are limpidly sinister and certainly incompatible with a functioning democracy.
Big Tech will no longer sanction any questions about vaccines even from Harvard-trained immunologists who are quoting regime data. The Big Tech companies censor everything, but ecstatic verbalize and propaganda about vaccines. Period.
Soon Dr. Noorchashm received this message from Silicon Valley, quote: “Our team has reviewed your content and haplessly, we cerebrate it breaches our medical misinformation policy. We’ve abstracted the following content from YouTube.”
So Dr. Hooman Noorchashm was muted by Google, but the world is an astronomically immense place thankfully, and Noorchashm was not the only person who has descried what is transpiring, what the data coming in from frontline scientists are verbalizing about this vaccine and its effects.
In Canada, a medico called Jean Marc Benoit has launched a petition alongside a Member of Parliament, Derek Sloan to suspend COVID-19 vaccinations for puerile people. That petition now has more than 25,000 signatures.
They have received dozens of reports from medicos and nurses working in hospitals with COVID patients, a component of the immunization campaign in Canada, saying that adolescent people are becoming earnestly ill after taking this vaccine, quote, “The COVID-19 vaccination is efficaciously human experimentation,” the petition reads.
Meanwhile, Germany, a country that does take science earnestly, is now recommending that salubrious adolescent people do not take the vaccine, that they evade it. Period. Because it’s too hazardous.
In this country, medicos have descried as well, the F.D.A. and the CDC have descried. The CDC is holding an emergency meeting to discuss these numbers, which two of our own regimes vaccine reporting systems substantiate are genuine.
YouTube is cognizant of all of this, how could they not be? And in case they weren’t, we laid it out in some detail in the clip they just ostracized. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: Between July 1, 1997 and the cessation of 2013, that’s five and a moiety years, there were 2,149 deaths reported in the U.S. for all vaccines cumulated on the VAERS system. Yet, in just six months — the last six months — there have been more than 5,160 deaths associated with the COVID vaccines as reported to VAERS.
That’s more than double the number of deaths in less than one-tenth the time. What does that designate? How do you explicate that? Oh, but those numbers are erroneous, verbally expressed the customary prevaricators with maximum hysteria. Okay, let’s verbalize they are erroneous. What are the authentic numbers?
How many people have been killed or injured by the COVID vaccines? Does anyone ken the answer? (END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: Yes, well, that’s all reported on regime websites. Go to the HHS website. But if you read those numbers out loud, you will be penalized. If you read regime data in public, you will be censored. And such as this exhibition. Maybe that’s one of the reasons, by the way, nobody does read regime data on the air because they ken they’ll be censored, but some persist anyway.
Yesterday, a medico called Tracy Hoeg, who has a PhD in epidemiology — qualified to discuss this — authenticated on to Twitter to discuss the data on heart inflammation among adolescent people. Quote, “Post vaxx myocarditis was pellucidly above baseline at the cessation of May. We are standing on shaky ground if we verbally express the jeopardy to otherwise salubrious kids from COVID-19 is higher than it emanates from the vaccine.” Get it?
That is rooted in scientific data. It’s a conspicuous visual examination and it has profound public health implicative insinuations for tens of millions of people in this country. And yet within seconds, Twitter flagged her tweet as quote, “misleading.”
Tracy Hoeg, who is a scientist seemed stunned by this. “I’m quoting the “CDC’s” own slide,” she inscribed, and of course, quoting the CDC used to be sanctioned. As of just months ago, as long as you quoted credentialed experts or regime data, you’re sanctioned to discuss science as a layman or even as a medico or researcher. Those are the rules that YouTube inscribed.
Now, even quoting the Biden administration’s own vaccine harm numbers will get you censored immediately. Ron Johnson is a sitting United States Senator was just suspended from YouTube because he suggested that hydroxychloroquine might be a treatment for the coronavirus, which it turns out, it is. Senator Johnson additionally verbally expressed you might not require the vaccine if you’ve had and recuperated from COVID. Those are not crazy positions. They are rooted in science.
Many researchers now accede with Ron Johnson including by the way, “Nature” Magazine. Are they vetoed? We don’t ken. Because now in the United States, you are no longer sanctioned to be anything less than a consummate across the board ebullient booster of vaccines for everybody.
And in fact, Tracy Hoeg and Ron Johnson may have gotten off facile with censorship. It could have been worse, they might have ended up in confinement. You cerebrate we’re japing. Several weeks ago, Michigan’s Attorney General, a lunatic, called Dana “Nessel,” ascertained that restaurant owner Marlena Hackney was orchestrating to come on this exhibition to verbalize about the state’s lockdown orders and their effect on her business. Nessel who is the chief law enforcement officer of the State of Michigan, one who muted Hackney and averted her from doing that.
She inscribed this email to her staff, which we are quoting and not making up, quote, “Do we ken her whereabouts? We should just have her picked up afore she goes on. This is outrageous.” Arrested so she can’t go on TV to repine about Dana Nessel’s lockdown orders. And in fact, a week later, Michigan State Police to their great shame, apprehended Marlena Hackney and threw her in confinement.
She was confined for daring to come on this exhibition. That transpired in the State of Michigan. Are you surprised? You shouldn’t be surprised because it was always the next step. This was never going to culminate with censorship on convivial media. Build your own Twitter. It was never going to culminate there.
If they can control what you indite, why can’t they control what you verbally express, and cerebrate, and do? Why can’t they throw you behind bars if you disaccord with them or upbraid their policies? Well, they can it turns out as Dana Nessel proved, and they will.
We’ve been moving toward this for a long time and not enough people have verbalized anything in replication to it. They cower and hope they won’t be penalized. But, they are going to be penalized if this perpetuates.
Remember back in September, a Chinese virologist with firsthand cognizance, a woman called Dr. Li-Meng Yan appeared on this exhibition to verbally express something we now ken likely transpired. She verbalized the COVID-19 virus emanated from a lab in Wuhan.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) DR. “LI-MENG” YAN, “VIROLOGIST:” From my first report, I can present the solid scientific evidence to our audience that this virus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 virus authentically does not emanate from nature.
I worked with the top corona virologist in the world, so together with my experience, I can tell you this as engendered in the lab. This emanates from that template owned by China military, and withal it is spread to the world to make such damage.
CARLSON: To make such damage. Do you believe the Chinese regime relinquished this intentionally? On purport? Did they do this? YAN: Yes, of course, it is intentionally. (END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: That turned out to be right, we believe, and an abundance of other people believe, but Facebook yanked that video down. They pulled it down, they censored it. And by the way, if you’re wondering why we’re always touting FOX Nation, the digital accommodation, the main reason is Google and Facebook don’t control it. It’s a subscription accommodation that goes directly from our servers to you through no intermediaries. They can’t censor it. That’s limpidly the future.
But Facebook did censor that. The 23-year old Oberlin graduates on Facebook decided they kenned more about the inchoations of COVID-19 than a Chinese virologist who was in Wuhan at the time. And to justify their censorship, they verbalized that a fact checking article that relied on what we ascertained later, a letter to the editor in The Lancet, not an article, a letter to the editor. And that letter we now ken, was indited by the very same people who are working to modify bat coronaviruses in Wuhan utilizing your tax dollars.
And by the way, that’s not the only proscribed theory that’s turned out to be more credible than the official story. There are a plethora of them. Here’s another. Back in April, one California medico was taken off YouTube, censored, for saying he was personally pressured to over report COVID deaths.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) DR. DAN “ERICKSON,” “PHYSICIAN” “IN” “BAKERSFIELD:” We aren’t pressured to test for flu. But ER medicos now, my friends that I verbalize with you verbally express, you ken, it’s fascinating when I’m — when I’m inscribing up my death report, I’m being pressured to integrate COVID. Why is that?
Why are we being pressured to integrate “COVID?” To maybe increase the numbers and make it look marginally worse than it is? I cerebrate so. (END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: That was Dr. Dan Erickson in Bakersfield, by the way he wasn’t, as you descried, verbally expressing that this was transpiring. He verbally expressed this transpired to him. He had firsthand direct experience of this transpiring and he was censored for saying it.
And by the way, he was right. It didn’t just transpire to him. This week, one of California’s most sizably voluminous counties, Alameda County admitted that it over reported COVID deaths by at least 25 percent. It turns out the county was including deaths from anything as long as the deceased had COVID at the time of death, by the way, George Floyd had COVID at the time of death. Was he a COVID death?
In Alameda County, you could fall off a ladder, get hit by a bus. But until this week, you were a COVID death if you had antibodies in your system. That’s true. But the tech monopolies sanctioned no one to verbally express that. Not because saying that was mendacious. Oh, no, no, they wouldn’t let you verbally express it because it was precise.
How long can this continue?
Source: You can read the original Breitbart article here.