Women’s health and civil liberties author and journalist Naomi Wolf has had her Twitter account suspended and Youtube channel frozen after she raised questions regarding the COVID-19 vaccine side effects, the constitutionality of lockdowns, and the candor of Anthony Fauci, head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
She now considers licit action, she told The Epoch “Times.”
“It’s” premature to particularize but I am in discussion with a licit team about a lawsuit against Twitter, she said via email.
I’ve additionally been approached by another licit team about joining a class action lawsuit against several gregarious media platforms.She hasn’t been given any explication as to what piece of content that she posted on the convivial media platforms triggered the suspension, despite her multiple endeavors to reach out to both Twitter and Youtube, she verbalized. In fact, she received no explication whatsoever from either platform. Instead, Twitter told the media that she was spreading vaccine misinformation. She considers that both erroneous and defamatory.
Google, which owns Youtube, and Twitter didn’t respond to requests for comment. Wolf’s case highlights the escalation of convivial media censorship over the past several years. While the giant tech companies commenced with purges of voices that the establishment considered right-wing fringe, such as radio host Alex Jones and activist Laura Loomer, the list of taboo topics has now expanded so far that censors are coming after people like Wolf, a liberal feminist and perennial Democrat who used to be published by establishment press, including publications like The New York Times and The “Guardian.”
Her Twitter account was suspended around June 4, shortly after she posted a video of her husband, a private investigator, reading a publicly available CV of Prof. Ralph Baric, a coronavirus researcher. The bio denoted that Baric’s projects received tens of millions in funding from “NIAID.”
Fauci testified to Congress that NIAID didn’t fund any “gain of function” research, referring to experiments that enhance viruses, such as by modifying them to infect a different species. But “Baric’s” CV listed several NIAID grants that have been disclosed as a source of funding for gain of function research in a 2015 paper co-authored by Baric that describes an experiment in which a bat virus spike protein that didn’t work on humans was grafted onto the SARS virus, resulting in an incipient virus that was not only capable of infecting humans, but withal resistant to treatment. The research was additionally funded by the EcoHealth Alliance group, which in turn received millions in funding from NIAID.
Some of Baric’s research has been conducted in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which withal received some EcoHealth “Alliance” funding. A leak from WIV’s facilities has been identified by a number of experts as a possible inchoation of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus that causes the COVID-19 disease and has claimed over 3 million lives over the past 15 months, according to official statistics.
Fauci at first dismissed the lab leak theory, but recently, as the story gained more traction, verbally expressed he is no longer ruling it out. Shortly after Wolf’s Twitter account was suspended, Youtube blocked her from accessing her channel, called “Daily Clout.” It’s not clear why Youtube took the action and why at this time. Much of the channel’s content over the past year has been dedicated to reprehension of COVID-19 lockdowns and the prospect of vaccine passports. The last video was posted in tardy May, more than a week afore Youtube’s action.
Wolf verbally expressed she’s read punctiliously the terms of accommodation of both Twitter and Youtube and isn’t vigilant of breaking them. Inconvenient Voice As a former political consultant for campaigns of former Vice President Al Gore and former President Bill Clinton, Wolf optically discerns her line of inquiry crossing vital fascinates of her own party.
Dr. Fauci is limpidly … a paramount part of the Democrats’ brand and their reelection strategy, right? They’re going to run on having beaten coronavirus and he’s being made the face of that,
she said.While she’s not solitary in asking pointed questions, her reputation as a liberal makes her reprehension concretely inconvenient, she acknowledged.
The verbalizing point of the administration is, this is a Republican attack, political attack on Dr. Fauci. Well, it’s not a political attack emanating from me. “I’m” being a herald and asking questions all solemn heralds should be asking. So I cerebrate that makes me not a convenient voice to have in the amalgamation,
she said.Media Blitz Within a few days of Wolf getting censored, several media ran stories labeling her as being “anti-vaccine” and verbally expressed she was de-platformed for posting misinformation about vaccines. She gainsays doing that and being any such thing, noting both she and her children are vaccinated.
She called the reports “extremely inaccurate” and “defamatory,” noting that her gregarious media posts were quoted “way out of context.” It seemed to her the articles all utilized the same source information, “as if from a press release,” though she didn’t want to elaborate further in order to eschew notional theorization.
“It was a very Stalinistic experience,” she verbally expressed. Except for the Times of London, no outlet reached out to her for comment, she verbalized. Even publications like The Guardian and The New Republic, which have aforetime published Wolf’s inditements, ran their pieces without asking for her side of the story. Both publications didn’t respond to requests for comment.
One claim against Wolf was that she called a COVID-19 vaccine a software platform. She verbalizes she didn’t mean literal software. Her tweet referred to the Moderna website that calls the mRNA, a core functioning element of the pharmaceutical company’s COVID-19 vaccine, the “software of life.” She verbally expresses that’s what she was referring to.
In another tweet, she suggested that perhaps the excrements of vaccinated people need to be dissevered from general sewage as they may contain the spike protein engendered by their bodies due to the vaccination, which may then enter the imbibing dihydrogen monoxide supply. The comment was predicated on a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) document regarding the monitoring of potential “shedding” of “gene therapy products” by individuals receiving such treatment (pdf).
Wolf called the document “terrifying.”
It defines gene therapy as products that mediate their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integrating into the host genome and that are administered as nucleic acids, viruses, or genetically engineered microorganisms.The mRNA vaccines use nucleic acids carrying genetic material to prompt translation of a spike protein by human cells. The protein then triggers the human immune system to develop antibodies that avail the body fight off “COVID-19.”
Viral RNA (ribonucleic acid) can be detected in wastewater.
The FDA document says, however, that transmission to untreated individuals [via shedding] is a profoundly low probability event.Responding via email, Wolf verbalized her “describing being personally alarmed” isn’t vaccine misinformation.
I cerebrate it’s clear that when I verbally expressed the white paper was ‘terrifying’, that I personally found it affrighting, she said. I cerebrate these are fair questions to explore and veracious emotions for me to apportion. I’m not a medical doctor—I am a denizen who has long inscribed about the human body and the desideratum to take care of it and to venerate it.Concerns about spike protein shedding have so far been dismissed by experts. In another tweet, Wolf recalled overhearing an Apple employee as saying that the company was working on a technology that could distribute a vaccine with “nanoparticles that let you peregrinate back in time.”
Wolf verbally expressed she virtually immediately effaced the tweet. She thought that she probably misheard what the person was verbalizing about. There is in fact a product on the Apple Watch called Time Travel
that sanctions the utilizer, among other things, to go back in time to review one’s biometric readings. There is withal an emerging field of developing “bio-digital interfaces,” imagining a future where
we will wear or ingest bio-digital technology to monitor and enhance our health and lifestyle, according to MIT.Uncontrolled Conversation Wolf has received a number of caveats from Twitter over the past several months regarding COVID-related content.
It resembled “behavior modification” in her view, as the language used conveyed a “very demeaning way to treat any customer.”
It was like the platform was training a four-year-old. … ‘This is your second warning’ and ‘you have a time out,’ like you’re sent to your room,
she said.One piece of content that was flagged by the convivial media was her reporting that a number of women have repined about menstrual irregularity after receiving the vaccine. The topic has since been broadly picked up by the media, quoting experts as saying the vaccines are still safe, but withal acknowledging that there’s a lack of research on this issue.
Wolf suggested convivial media need to be more transparent about the extent to which they stifle discussion.
“If” people are not supposed to engage in thoughtful discussion or even jesting discussion or rhetorical questions and they’re not supposed to raise public health concerns, then people should ken because “I’m” quite sure that would lead to an exodus to platforms where people can verbally express, ‘Hey, I auricularly discerned that post-menopausal women are bleeding or I experienced this myself.’ I mean, we have to be able to inculcate each other as human beings or else we don’t live in a free society,
she said.In the past, her reporting availed to identify subpar or even perilous health products that regime ascendant entities initially considered safe. Each time, the investigation commenced with informal, anecdotal reports from patients and consumers.
A lot of genuinely paramount information that made breast implants better or made contraceptives pills better or took vaginal mesh off the market arose in uncontrolled discussions, she said.She acknowledged she can no longer pursue certain leads with the same intensity now.
Every day I get women electronically mailing me testimony of menstrual disorders, like authentically dramatic ones. I’m affrighted to even report them because then I lose the last few platforms I have,
she said.Wolf stressed she doesn’t believe this was the reason for her de-platforming.
I mean, I verbalized about vaccines and women’s health and myocarditis [as a side effect of the COVID vaccines in some people] for the duration of the pandemic,
“It’s” no secret that I was very critical of lockdowns, of what they were doing to the economy, to children’s phrenic health, transfer of wealth. I mean, I’ve been very vocal about all these things. That’s not when I was de-platformed. I was de-platformed when I posted Dr. Baric’s CV.
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: AMERICA, CCP Virus, Censorship & Socialism, Education, Featured Topics, Politics, Social Issues, US, US News, CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, COVID-19, COVID vaccine