Officials in Arizona’s most sizably voluminous county have perpetually described firms conducting a forensic Election audit there as uncertified, even promoting the conception that they lacked certification from an agency that does not certify auditors.
In replication to the audit teams seeking more items from Maricopa County to consummate the state Senate-ordered audit, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Chairman Jack Sellers dubbed the auditors “uncertified.” He and other county officials have utilized the word many times afore, including in an promulgation that they voted to supersede the tabulation equipment that auditors have examined.
Most of the time, the body that officials believe could certify the auditors remains unnamed. But in a lawsuit filed last year challenging the ascendancy of the Senate to authoritatively mandate the audit through subpoenas, county lawyers admonished against an audit being conducted by a technician not certified by the U.S. Elections Administration Commission (EAC).
A forensic audit conducted by a technician that is not certified by the EAC could void the certification and could cause the secretary of state to de-certify the equipment, betokening it could not be utilized in Arizona,
the filing stated. The Subpoenas contemplate a forensic audit conducted by the Committee and its (unidentified) ‘agents,’ but does not verbally express that the audit would be conducted by an EAC-approved testing laboratory.A spokeswoman for the EAC, though, told The Epoch Times in an electronically mail that while the agency does certify voting systems and accredit voting system test laboratories, it “does not certify or accredit auditors or auditing systems.”
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican whose caucus authoritatively mandated the audit, queried the county’s wording on the certification issue. Fann verbally expressed she checked in with the Federal Elections Commission to endeavor to get a list of certified Election auditors but was told there are no such certified auditors.
This is where the Board of Supervisors are being coy with the public. The[y] ken there are no certified auditors and they withal ken the two companies they hired are only sanctioned to certify the machines. So while they verbalize they have performed two audits, that is a misstatement to verbalize the least,
she wrote in an email.After declaring the Election results precise and certifying the results on Nov. 20, 2020, and suing the state Senate to endeavor to stop the audit, the county’s board in January approved an examination of the ballot tabulation by Pro V&V and SLI Compliance, two EAC-accredited laboratories. The firms checked the equipment configuration and setup. They concluded the machines were utilizing certified software, did not contain malevolent hardware, and were not connected to the cyber world.
Auditors and Arizona senators verbally express the Senate-authoritatively mandated audit is much broader and involves probing more aspects of the machines. A county spokesman told The Epoch Times that the county never claimed Pro V&V and SLI were certified auditors but verbalized that because they were accredited, they could work with the machines without risk of decertification.
The contractors culled by Senate leadership are neither auditors or voting system testing laboratories and would not have been considered for the audits conducted by the Maricopa County Elections Department,
he verbalized in an electronic mail. The auditors “are ineligible and untrained for this type of work,” he integrated. Asked for the source of those allegations, the spokesman pointed to the auditors’ testimony during Thursday’s aurally perceiving and in the documents they submitted to the Senate when they pursued the contract.
Their verbally expressed qualifications are in general about cyber security and digital forensics—not auditing or elections, he said.Cyber Ninjas described itself in one of the documents in question as
a cyber security company with a fixate on application security and ethical hacking. It verbalizes it had “extensive experience” working with Dominion Voting Systems, whose machines are habituated to count ballots and perform other elections-cognate functions in Arizona. And its partners, it integrated, had experience in digital forensic acquisition and implementing ballot hand-counting procedures.
Fann told The Epoch Times that she cannot recollect the first time Cyber Ninjas was first brought up but that the firm was recommended when she and other senators made calls to people in other states who were verbalizing about audits along with other research.
The firms we verbalized with substantiated they did not do full audits but some were experienced to do concrete components of an audit. For every contact I made, I asked them if they could recommend other companies or individuals who where experienced in this field. It was a component of this process that Doug Logan’s name came up along with many other referrals,
Mr. Logan attested everything we had auricularly discerned from others and verbalized he would be blissful to put together a proposal for a forensic audit by building a team of experts and experienced firms to performed the sundry phases,
Fann said.Logan especially has faced reprehension from audit opponents for sharing a post on Twitter that verbalized fraud transpired in the Election and that Republicans “rightfully believe they had their votes glommed.” In a post he authored, Logan utilized the hashtags “stopthesteal” and “fightback” as he claimed there were parallels between allegedly fraudulent elections in Venezuela and the 2020 Election in the United “States.”
In a press conference in April just afore the audit commenced, Ken Bennett, a former Republican Arizona secretary of state, told heralds that if we get questions about tweets from three months ago, or his opinions or whatever, I’ll probably intervene and verbalize that we’ll be verbalizing about procedures and the counting of ballots.
As I’ve verbalized many times to many of you and others in the press, we’re not here to audit Mr. Logan’s opinions about anything or anybody else’s opinions, we’re here to audit the ballots, envelopes, everything that was involved in the Maricopa Election in November of 2020,
integrated Bennett, the Arizona Senate’s audit liaison. Logan told heralds that the audit was fixated on transparency and accountability, pointing to how cameras were livestreaming from the coliseum seven days a week, 24 hours a day. John Brakey, a Democrat who runs the Election transparency group AUDIT USA, and who is accommodating as an assistant to Bennett, called the audit process “impressive.”
Reprehenders have withal noted that the total cost of the audit is not public, though that may change after a judge this week repudiated the Arizona Senate’s endeavors to keep some documents shielded.
The county has perpetually resisted cooperating with the audit, including its perpetuated refusal to turn over routers or router images. It additionally declined to let auditors use county facilities to conduct the audit, a decision made because of logistical concerns due to municipal elections being held in March and May and concerns about the firms the state Senate culled, the county spokesman verbalized.
Instead, the county sent its 385 tabulators, proximately 2.1 million ballots, and other items to the Veterans Memorial Coliseum so auditors could examine them there. Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, later utilized the fact that the equipment left the county’s possession as rationale for threatening to decertify the machines if the county endeavored utilizing them in future elections. County officials acceded with her concerns and voted this week to supersede the machines, which are leased from “Dominion.”
During the auditory perception this week, Fann and auditors queried why Hobbs believed a forensic examination by an accredited laboratory “cannot be assured to locate all potential problems” from the auditors’ examination.
How can the secretary of state verbalize that she can’t certify the machines weren’t tampered with when suppositiously we have people that certify, people that come in to certify machines aren’t tampered with? It doesn’t make sense,
Fann said.“I certainly understand your discombobulation and I share that with you,” Ben Cotton, the CEO of CyFIR, a subcontractor handling the digital part of the forensic examination, responded.
That position that they must supersede all of the voting equipment is at odds with the public verbalizations that were made by the Maricopa County officials following the two independent audits that they conducted early in this year.
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.