Michigan May Join Arizona, Florida in Limiting Local Control of Short-Term Rentals
LANSING, Mich.—Michigan may anon become the latest of a handful of vacation destination states to enact laws bulwarking the short-term residential rental industry. Since the advent of online booking and amassment accommodations such as Airbnb and VRBO, short-term rentals have become immensely colossal business in states like Arizona, Florida, Idaho, and Tennessee, all of which have utilized state law to keep municipalities from vetoing or over-regulating short-term rental properties.
The popularity of short-term rentals is conspicuous in places like “Miami,” Florida, and “Scottsdale,” Arizona. According to realtor.com, Miami has 10,024 active short-term rentals, while Scottsdale has 5,178. In Michigan, there were more than 17,000 short-term rentals operating through sizably voluminous agencies in 2019, a number which has grown substantially every year since.
A short-term rental is defined as the renting of a single-family home for a period of 30 days or less. It can range from a spare bedroom to a dormitory, condo, or lavish beach house. They are commonly utilized for vacation recedes, and as ephemeral living quarters for visiting professionals, or by incipient hires arriving in an incipient community.
The explosive magnification of short-term rentals has incited controversy, pitting the rights of the individual homeowner to do with his property as he gratifies, against the rights of his neighbor to the mute delectation of his property.
Recently, a homeowner in St. Clair Shores, “Michigan,” who rented out his house short-term, was criminally charged by the city with operating a business in an area not zoned for rentals. This incident is visually perceived by many, including Michigan cerebrate tank the Mackinac Center, and Michigan Realtors, who both became involved in the case, as an impetus for the incipient legislation.
The proposed law, Michigan Senate Bill 446, states that a short-term residential rental counts as residential, not commercial, utilization of a property. It declares that short-term rentals are to be considered a sanctioned use in all residential zones and are not subject to special-use or conditional-use sanctions different from those required for other dwellings in the same zone.
While preserving the potency of a municipality to regulate public safety and health through ordinances governing noise, signage, and traffic, “or any other condition that may engender a nuisance,” the bill demands that the rules must be consistently applied to all dwellings in the community. This clause precludes local regimes from imposing special ordinances concrete to short-term rentals, such as a constraint on the number of bedrooms, an inhibition on the number of people who can slumber in a bedroom, and the requisite of indoor parking.
Holly Tatman, a village manager in a Michigan lakeside resort community told the Epoch Times, “It’s” eccentric that state regime is coming down on the side of deregulation. They are customarily the sizably voluminous regulators. This bill is tying the community’s hands. It takes away local control.The Michigan Municipal League (MML), a major opponent of the legislation, verbally expressed in a verbalization, Long-term denizens deserve to have their property rights forfended too…[the bill] plenarily divests municipalities of plausible zoning regulations. The MML cited the experience of Sedona, Arizona, which, it verbalized, visually perceived one-third of its housing convert to short-term rentals following deregulation akin to that proposed in Michigan. The organization verbalizes the trend contributed to a shortage of affordable housing.
On the other hand, the Michigan Realtors, vigorous adherents of the incipient legislation, contend that short-term rentals contribute to the ascension in property values in a community, and that only the well-maintained operations prosper in the rialto.
Michigan Realtors vice-president of public policy and licit affairs, Brad Ward, told the Epoch Times, At the heart of this bill is the bulwark of private property rights.The principal sponsors of the bill are Senator Aric Nesbitt (R-Lawton) and Representative Sarah Lightner (R-Springport). The legislation has been forwarded out of committee with a recommendation of approbation in the Senate. The bill has been referred for its second reading in the House. No date has been set for a vote by the full legislature.
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: Illinois, Local News, Policy, Politics, Regional & Local News, US, US News, Michigan, Short-term rental, Airbnb