Justice Memo Backing Mandatory COVID Shots ‘Is Absurd,’ Religious Liberty Group Claims
A Department of Justice (DOJ) memorandum claims regime and private corporations can mandate that employees be vaccinated against the CCP Virus, additionally kenned as the novel coronavirus, even though federal law designates the contrary.
An 18-page memorandum issued July 27 to fortify President Joe Biden’s direction that federal employees be required to be vaccinated or face stringent testing and masking requisites turns around interpretation of Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and its stipulations regarding drugs that are issued under the emergency use sanction (EUA) that enables the FDA to approve experimental drugs to be administered under dire public health circumstances.
Addressed to the deputy counsel for the president, the memorandum verbalizes, you have asked whether the ‘option to accept or refuse’ condition of section 564 proscribes entities from imposing such vaccination requisites while the only available vaccines for COVID-19 remain subject to “EUAs.”
“We conclude, consistent with FDA’s interpretation, that it does not. This language in section 564 designates only that certain information be provided to potential vaccine recipients and does not preclude entities from imposing vaccination requisites.All three of the anti-CCP Virus vaccinations are only sanctioned under the EUA provision, and that’s why the DOJ memorandum is consummately erroneous, according to Liberty Counsel, a Florida-based public interest law firm that specializes in religious liberation litigation under the First Amendment to the U.S. “Constitution.”
Liberty Counsel promulgated earlier this week that it will represent a group of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) who object to the government’s requisite that they be vaccinated against the pernicious virus that has killed more than 660,000 Americans since early 2020.
Liberty Counsel spokesman Holly Meade told The Epoch Times July 30 that we are inundated with people asking for avail. We consider it a great privilege to lead the way in this fight. This is a life and death situation, and people need our avail.Liberty Counsel claims in its analysis of the DOJ memorandum that it is fundamentally flawed and … cannot be read to sanction the regime or private entities to mandate an experimental product approved merely for emergency use. In fact, the memorandum even admits multiple times that the EUA law and the FDA require the ‘option to accept or reluct.’
The Liberty Counsel response continues, none of the COVID shots are approved or licensed by the FDA. They come under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), which betokens they cannot be coerced or required,
Liberty Counsel states in the scathing verbalization issued July 29.
On page 1 of the DOJ memo, and many times thereafter, the DOJ correctly states that Section 564 of the federal law directs the FDA ‘to the extent practicable’ and as the FDA ‘finds obligatory or opportune … to impose ‘[a]appropriate’ conditions on each EUA …
“The memo perpetuates: ‘Some of these conditions are designed to ascertain that recipients of the product are ‘informed’ of certain things, including ‘the option to accept or reluct administration of the product.’
The memo withal states on page 1 that since December 2020, the FDA granted EUAs for COVID shots. ‘In each of these sanctions, FDA imposed the ‘option to accept or refuse’ condition. The memo then correctly notes that the FDA Fact Sheet states, ‘It is your cull to receive or not receive’ the COVID shots.
“Despite this clear ‘option to accept or refuse’ language, and despite admitting the FDA has publicly affirmed this ‘option to accept or reluct,’ the DOJ memo verbalizes it does not mean you have the option to reluct.
“The ‘option to accept or reluct,’ the DOJ asserts, is met merely by telling people they have the ‘option to accept or reluct,’ and, once told, people can be coerced to take these shots. This is akin to interpreting the Miranda Rights to mean once you have been told ‘You have the option to remain mute,’ then you can be coerced to verbalize! This is absurd.Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver verbalized in his firm’s analysis that in integration to the plain language of the EUA law and the FDA, employees and students have rights under state and federal laws, including the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause, to reluct injecting a drug into their bodies.
“It is shocking that the DOJ intentionally apostatized the public with its lawless, result-oriented memorandum. We will not sanction the law and the people to be trampled by employers, schools or this administration.The Epoch Times has asked DOJ for a replication to Liberty Counsel’s analysis, but has not received a replication as yet.
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: Executive Branch, Politics, US, COVID-19 Vaccines, Veterans administration, Mandatory vaccination