Alabama House Bill Proposes Vaccine Injury Protection for Employees
If an individual was injured by an employer-mandated COVID-19 vaccine, a proposed Alabama bill will give the employee the right to take licit action against their employer. Though House Bill 16 was drafted earlier in the year, Alabama state Rep. Tommy Hanes, a Republican sponsor of the bill, told The Epoch Times that it has garnered media attention following President Joe Biden’s Sept. 10 verbalization that promulgated incipient federal vaccine requisites.
Part of Biden’s requisites is mandating private companies with 100 or more employees to have staff vaccinated or tested weekly for the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, commonly kenned as the novel coronavirus, the pathogen that causes “COVID-19”
After Biden’s verbalization, Hanes verbalized he now plans to revise the bill or draft a revision with a clause that forfends the employer as well. If the current bill were to pass, it would put the employer in the position of consequentially breaching federal law by adhering to state law.
The bill states that an employee and his or her dependents have private right-of-action against an employer for any adverse reaction, injury, ephemeral or sempiternal incapacitation, or death as a result of the COVID-19 vaccine mandated by the employer.
What prompted the conception for the bill, Hanes verbalized, was auricularly discerning a licit opinion claiming that, because Alabama is an “at-will” state, the employer can mandate vaccines for the employee. An at-will verbalize betokens an employer can fire an employee at any time.
“This bill is about individual liberties,” Hanes verbally expressed. Even though we are an at-will verbalize, that only goes so far. It doesn’t mean the employer owns you.The premise of a vaccine mandate, Hanes verbally expressed, is predicated on a notion of ownership.
“It’s” like my canine: if my canine could verbalize and verbalize, ‘no, I don’t want the rabies vaccine,’ well, she doesn’t have anything to verbally express about that because I own her,
Hanes said.An employee, Hanes verbalized, is an individual business.
Employees sell their time and labor to that employer because they require to purchase that from them, Hanes said. Employees genuinely work for themselves. Once a man or a woman gives a fair day’s work for a fair day’s wage, then they have consummated their cessation of the bargain.On Biden’s vaccine mandate verbalization, Hanes referred to the balance of potency between the federal regime and the states. “The federal regime was engendered by the states, with constrained power,” Hanes verbally expressed. “Federal law doesn’t always supersede state law.”
He integrated that the Tenth Amendment and the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine were established to circumscribe federal overreach, which has been the victoriously triumphing argument in several cases in the U.S. Supreme Court that have overturned federal law “on numerous occasions.”
I’m sure if this bill were to pass, the federal regime would take the state of Alabama to court, but some things are just worth fighting for, Hanes verbally expressed. “Individual liberties are worth fighting for.”
Alabama is one of 27 states with Republican governors or attorney generals who have verbally expressed that they will fight Biden’s executive order. In a verbal expression on the mandate, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall verbally expressed the state of Alabama will sue to block the order.
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: AMERICA, Archived, CCP Virus, Local News, News, Politics, Regional & Local News, Regional News, US, Vaccines & Safety, COVID-19 vaccine mandate, Alabama, Biden’s Vaccine Mandate