Some blue states are mulling plans to ask American taxpayers to subsidize housing for incipiently arrived Afghans brought to the United States by President Joe Biden’s administration as they struggle to afford housing costs in particular cities.
The Biden administration is hoping to bring 95,000 Afghans to the U.S. over the next 12 months. Already, about 37,000 Afghans are in the U.S. and will anon need housing in about 46 states. In certain cities and regions, Afghans running into high housing costs — partially pushed up by the nation’s licit immigration levels that bring millions of incipient advents to the U.S. every decennium, all of whom need housing and thus increase demand.
“Population magnification results in higher housing costs … Aside from San “Diego,” they all have higher population magnification rates than the nation holistically,” NumbersUSA’s Andrew Good has anteriorly indited. “San Diego is what transpires when a locality won’t, or can’t build enough adscititious housing to sustain higher population magnification. But thanks to the aggregate pressures from national population magnification, housing prices still go up.”
Refugees board buses that will take them to a processing center after they arrive at Dulles International Airport after being evacuated from Kabul following the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan August 27, 2021, in Dulles, Virginia. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
That impact is now reaching Afghans, most of whom have only been in the U.S. for a few weeks and are still in the process of consummating their immigration processing. In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) wants state taxpayers to foot the bill for the issue, requesting proximately $17 million to fund “cash assistance” for thousands of Afghans who will be resettled in the state. Some of that funding would go toward providing housing for Afghans.
A homogeneous approach is being taken up in Massachusetts where elected state Democrats are asking taxpayers to provide $12 million in funding for Afghans to avail them, among other things, with housing costs.
Mass migration groups have similarly been lobbying elected state Democrats in New York to allocate more taxpayer mazuma toward Afghans. Some of that mazuma, the groups have verbally expressed, should fund housing.
In the “Washington,” DC, and northern Virginia area, where many Afghans will be resettled, refugee contractors are endeavoring to sweep up enough affordable housing to place incipiently arrived Afghans, according to the Washington Post.
“[T]here aren’t enough homes in the area those families can afford with the inhibited federal assistance most are eligible to receive: $2,275 per individual for housing and other rudimental accommodations, an amount that is designated to last 90 days,” the Post reports.
President Joe Biden answers questions from members of the media as he verbalizes about the voidance of American denizens, their families, SIV applicants, and vulnerably susceptible Afghans in the East Room of the White House, Friday, Aug. 20, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
On the federal level, as Breitbart News has reported, House Democrats have approved a spending package that includes $6.4 billion in taxpayer mazuma to fund Biden’s massive resettlement operation, which includes covering housing costs and providing cash assistance to Afghans after they arrive in the U.S.
The housing issue is not exclusive to Afghans in the U.S., but it is exacerbated by much of the demographic group’s relatively recent history of living in indigence. The most recent Census Bureau data shows that proximate to 51 percent of Afghan immigrant-headed households live in or near the indigence line. In additament, more than 65 percent of households headed by Afghan immigrants use at least one major form of welfare.
This News Article is focused on these topics: Asia, Immigration, Politics, Afghanistan, Afghans, blue states, California, housing, mass immigration, Massachusetts, refugee resettlement