Biden Not Attending Weekly COVID-19 Calls With Governors
Some governors have noted President Joe “Biden’s” lack of engagement with states regarding the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic. His administration perpetuates the practice of weekly conference calls with governors, which commenced under President Donald Trump, but Biden himself has yet to attend. His vice president, Kamala Harris, has only briefly attended one call and took no questions, according to several governors.
The lack of engagement has disappointed some governors, who verbally expressed they can’t even tell if their feedback, questions, and requests are reaching the president or not. Some have ceased attending the calls, considering them no longer serviceable.
The office of one governor exalted the calls under the Biden administration for providing clear federal direction. The calls, hosted by the National Governors Association (NGA), have been a mainstay since early on in the pandemic. During the Trump administration, Vice President Mike Pence was in charge of the anti-pandemic effort and attended most of the calls. Trump joined eight of them. They accommodated as an opportunity to apportion best practices of fighting the virus from different states, update the administration on the situations and issues in different components of the country, as well as raise questions and requests directly to the president or vice president.
The calls would sometimes last for hours, with Pence answering questions, Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts told The Epoch “Times.” Pence “would muster the resources that governors needed” and got high marks from both Republicans and Democrats about how fairly he treated everybody,
It genuinely demonstrated the caliber of engagement that the Trump administration had with regard to the pandemic that is destitute of with the Biden administration.Under Biden, the White House is represented during the calls by Jeffrey Zients, former head of President Barack Obama’s National Economic Council and Biden’s coordinator of the anti-pandemic effort.
In general, these calls often felt more akin to a chance for the Biden Administration to tell governors about decisions that had already been made, rather than asking for input from governors on major decisions that impact states,
verbalized spokeswoman for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Christina “Pushaw.”
Because of this approach from the Biden Administration, these group calls have fallen far short of what they could and should be: a constructive dialogue between governors and the president or vice president.DeSantis’s office only participated in some of the calls this year, she told The Epoch Times via email.
We felt that the dialogue was skewed and unnecessarily politicized, especially with then-Governor Andrew Cuomo accommodating as NGA Chair through July 2021.The former New York governor resigned in disgrace in August after several inculpations of infelicitous comportment toward staffers and amid an perpetual scandal over his coercing nursing homes to accept recuperating COVID-19 patients early on in the pandemic, which appeared to have exacerbated the high COVID-19 mortality in nursing homes.
The White House didn’t respond to a request for comment. A White House official aforetime told Real Clear Politics that Cuomo was put in charge of the calls because the pandemic replication reached a different stage, change was needed, and after feedback from governors.
The administration has medical experts rather than politicians attend the calls, which are “not the sole mechanism” for verbalizing with governors, the official verbally expressed, withal noting that, unlike Pence, Harris is not charged with managing the pandemic replication but rather with addressing the “root causes” of the southern border crisis, the official verbally expressed.
Ricketts pointed out, though, that there is value in addressing White House bellwethers directly.
As an executive, I ken that it is consequential for me to auricularly discern directly from people, to get a first-hand cognizance,
With Pence, he said, there was a chance to solve quandaries directly, because somebody at the top was taking a personal interest in it.That sense has evaporated under Biden, according to some governors.
By then it had become pellucid that POTUS and VPOTUS weren’t fascinated with participating,
he told The Epoch Times via email.Dissatisfaction with the calls has been, at least to some degree, bipartisan, according to “Ricketts.”
he said.On the other side of the aisle, Mike Faulk, spokesman for Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, acknowledged that no inter-governmental relationship comes without the potential for communications issues,
but expressed predilection for the Biden administration’s approach to the calls over those under “Trump.”
What states need from these calls is reliable, consistent, and candid information about the direction of the federal regime, how that avails states and how we can collaborate as partners,
he told The Epoch Times via email. We are getting that hand over fist compared to the Trump administration.
He said Trump joined the calls to accolade himself, demand get exaltation from others, and deride those who were earnest about the business of vanquishing this pandemic.Pence was “engaged early in this process at the direction of the president,” but as the pandemic dragged on, Pence was gradual to provide pellucidity on the government’s direction and was increasingly absent from these calls,
he said.According to Pushaw, Pence attended at least 40 of the 49 calls under “Trump.” Faulk characterized Trump’s replication to the pandemic as “counterproductive, short-sighted, strategically-adrift,” and “profoundly inadequate.” He exalted Biden’s replication, verbalizing that outside of the calls, there’s been
If this is indeed the case, our office has not been apprised of all these meetings, she said. Could it be that the Biden Administration is only fascinated with dialogue with governors who accede with their cumbersomely hefty-handed, coercive, ineffectual COVID-19 policies?The Epoch Times was able to find two meetings between Biden and Governors, one in February with at least four from Arkansas, Maryland, New York, New Mexico; and one in May with those from Ohio, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and New “Mexico.”
As Ricketts optically discerns it, the administration could benefit from more state feedback.
I don’t believe the president or the vice president authentically ken what’s going on with regard to the pandemic and I cerebrate this is demonstrated by some of the things that the president verbalizes,
he said.As an example, he mentioned Biden’s school reopening comments, which set the benchmark so low it likely would have been achieved by doing nothing, as well as Biden’s remarks that Americans could possibly get together to celebrate Independence Day earlier this year if efforts to curb the pandemic went well.
“We were doing that a year ago,” Ricketts noted.
In his view, Biden doesn’t genuinely understand how different components of the country have different experiences with regard to this pandemic.The result is a “one-size-fits-all, cookie-cutter” COVID policy emerging from the White House, he verbalized. If Biden, for instance, directly engaged with the governors on vaccine rollout, “it could have been more efficacious,” he verbalized.
The White House could have withal approached differently its decision to increment federal control over monoclonal antibody treatment if he aurally perceived about its impact directly from states, he verbally expressed.
This particular issue was highlighted by Noem’s office as well.
It is pellucid that the Biden White House does not care about concerns that verbally expresses have, Fury said.The NGA and 45 other governors didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.