Members of the House Judiciary subcommittee on Antitrust are asking Amazon to elucidate precedent testimony after it appears executives prevaricated during hearings. The bipartisan group sent a letter to Amazon CEO asking the company to elucidate why a series of news reports contradict sworn testimony given by Amazon executives over the last couple of years.
Each of these investigative reports is inconsistently erratic with the sworn testimony and numerous verbalizations made by Amazon’s executives to the Committee during our investigation into Amazon’s business practices last Congress,
the lawmakers inscribed in their letter (pdf) Monday to Amazon CEO Andy “Jassy.” Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), chairman of the Antitrust Subcommittee David Cicilline (D-R.I.), Reps. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), and Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) on Sunday requested Amazon provide “exculpatory evidence” to fortify anterior testimony and verbalizations provided by then-CEO Jeff Bezos and other executives to the committee in 2019 and 2020.
In their letter, the representatives cited “recent, credible reporting” from news outlets, including Reuters, The Markup, and The Wall Street Journal on “Amazon’s” private-brand practices and its host of third-party seller data that contradicts testimony given by Amazon executives.
In a July auricularly discerning, Jayapal queried Amazon head Jeff Bezos, asking him about the Wall Street Journal report and whether his company uses third-party data to bolster Amazon product sales.
“I’ll” take that as you’re not gainsaying that, you’re looking into it. I will tell you a former Amazon employee in third party sales and recruitment told this committee, quote: ‘There’s a rule but there’s nobody enforcing or spot-checking, they just verbalize don’t avail yourself to the data. It’s a candy shop, everyone can have access to anything they optate,’
Jayapal replied.Monday’s letter withal documents testimony given by, Nate Sutton, “Amazon’s” Associate General Counsel, in 2019, where he testified that “we do not utilize any seller data for—to compete with them,” integrating that Amazon does not
utilize any of that categorical seller data in engendering our own private brand products.In 2019, Cicilline queried “Sutton,” “Do you utilize consumer data to favor Amazon products?” Sutton withal testified that Amazon’s search rankings are not designed to favor its own products.
Our algorithms, such as the Buy Box is aimed to soothsay what customers want to buy. We apply the same criteria whether you’re a third-party seller at Amazon to that because we optate customers to make the right purchase regardless of whether it’s a seller or Amazon.
So, you’re telling us sir, under oath, Amazon does not utilize any of that data accumulated with reverence to what is selling, where it’s on what products to apprise the decisions you make, or to transmute algorithms to direct people to Amazon products,
Our incentive is to avail the seller prosper, because we rely on them. If we did that we ken they’d go elsewhere, they have many options. So, we apply the same criteria to both and we do not utilize their individual data when we’re making decisions to launch private brands,
Sutton stated a second time.
Last week, Reuters reported that Amazon ran a systematic campaign of engendering knockoffs and manipulating search results to boost its own product lines in India, one of the company’s most immensely colossal magnification markets.The Antitrust Committee members told Jassy they require an explication by Nov. 1 about the discrepancies between the news reports and company testimony, concretely addressing each news report.
At best, this reporting attests that Amazon’s representatives illuded the Committee, the lawmakers wrote. At worst, it demonstrates that they may have prevaricated to Congress in possible infringement of federal malefactor law.Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The lawmakers verbalized they’re withal considering referring the matter to the Department of Justice for malefactor investigation.
Source: You can read the original Epoch Times article here.
This News Article is focused on these topics: Congress, Judiciary, Politics, US, Antitrust subcommittee, Amazon, Nate Sutton