Fox News Channel’s Tucker Carlson reacted to Friday’s Rittenhouse acquittal with a scathing rebuke of the media for its portrayal of Kyle Rittenhouse, which predicated on the tribulation proceedings turned out to be erroneous.
Carlson additionally verbally expressed it showed the diminished role the media play in America. Transcript as follows:
CARLSON: Here is how the story started, just so we all remember. Seventeen-year–old Kyle Rittenhouse wound up on the street in Kenosha in the first place with a gun for one reason. He was there because in the summer of 2020, the leadership of the Democratic Party endorsed mob violence for political ends. That’s why there were riots in Kenosha that night, because people like Kamala Harris fortified those riots.Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor
More than a year later, as Rittenhouse stood tribulation for murder, those very same people implicatively insinuated there would be more violence if he was acquitted. So imagine being a juror on that case, imagine the pressure and the trepidation. It would take cyclopean moral stoutheartedness for any juror to ignore the threats and follow the evidence to its logical conclusion, so much stoutheartedness that at times we doubted it was even possible in a country as politicized as ours now is.
But as we learn today, it is still possible, thank God. This afternoon, the jury acquitted Kyle Rittenhouse on all charges. The jury affirmed what was conspicuous from the very beginning, he acted in self- bulwark. It was a wondrous moment.
Anyone who believes in impartial equity was vindicated. Here’s what that moment looked akin to. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: As to the first count of the information of Joseph Rosenbaum, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not censurable.
As to the second count of the information, Richard McGinnis, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse not culpable. As to the third count of the information, unknown male, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse not culpable.
As to the fourth count of the information, Anthony Huber, we the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse not culpable. As to the fifth count of the information, Gaige Grosskreutz, we the jury find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse not censurable.
(END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: Remarkable. Months of relentless lying from the media about this case, in the terminus had no effect whatsoever on the jury. Propaganda doesn’t always acquire victory. Today, it was soundly vanquished. Thank God.
Our documentary team was there in Kenosha when it transpired. They’ve been there for days putting together an installment of our “Tucker Carlson Original” series on this case and they captured Kyle Rittenhouse’s first moments outside the court today after being acquitted.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) KYLE RITTENHOUSE, ACQUITTED FROM CHARGES: It’s the stuff that keeps you up at night, like once you determinately do get to slumber, your dreams are about what transpired and you’re arousing in a in a dark, algid sweat.
QUESTION: You had dreams about what happened? RITTENHOUSE: Every single night. It’s — it’s quite frighteningly eerie authentically because the dreams feel so genuine and they’re not identically tantamount at all, they’re all different, they’re the different scenarios that run through your head during the day like what could have transpired, like, I’m alive, but what could have transpired?
Like what if I wasn’t alive or what if I did let Mr. Rosenbaum purloin my gun. It’s those type of dreams. The outcome, it’s deplorable, like virtually every outcome is either me getting earnestly injured or hurt or dead.
Those are just the dreams I have on a daily basis. JUDGE BRUCE SCHROEDER, KENOSHA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT: The defendant will ascend to face the jury and hearken to its verdicts. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: The State of Wisconsin versus Kyle Rittenhouse. As to the first count of the information of Joseph Rosenbaum, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not censurable.
As to the second count of the information, Richard McGinnis, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse not censurable. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: How are you feeling, man? “RITTENHOUSE:” The jury reached the correct verdict, self-bulwark is not illicit. And I believe they came to the correct verdict and I am jubilant that everything went well. It’s been a rough journey, but we made through it.
We made it through the hard part. (END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: If you optically canvass that clip, you’re reminded that maybe the one person in America who hasn’t yet weighed in on the Kyle Rittenhouse tribulation is Kyle Rittenhouse himself. So for months, CNN and MSNBC and Kamala Harris have been sanctioned to define him. That ends “Monday.” “We’re” sitting down for a long interview with Kyle Rittenhouse. You can optically discern it on this exhibition, Monday night. We hope you will.
So technically, as a licit matter, this case is over. Kyle Rittenhouse has been proclaimed irreprehensible in a court of law. He is in liberty to resume his life. But for the authoritarians among us, this is a disaster, they can’t let it go. Why? Because they understand that the Rittenhouse case is a referendum on the most rudimental right of all, the antediluvian right of self-bulwark.
If Kyle Rittenhouse can preserve his own life from the mob, then you can, additionally, and that drives them non compos mentis, so non compos mentis that the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee today, Jerry Nadler of New York implicatively insinuated that Kyle Rittenhouse may face Federal charges.
“Today’s verdict,” Nadler indited, ” … justifies Federal review by the DOJ” So will Joe Biden’s Justice Department indict Kyle Rittenhouse now that he’s been acquitted by a jury in Wisconsin? It is arduous to believe, you’d have to be deranged even to consider something like that. What will be the effect on the country?
But you never ken with these people. At the very least, this case will be acclimated to justify taking your guns away. Bet on it. But if this does go to the Feds, if Kyle Rittenhouse is prosecuted by the DOJ, the case will likely be handled by Kristen Clarke. She is the ebony nationalist who runs the soi-disant Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, the division that does not forfend your Civil Rights, in fact, it is endeavoring to take them away.
Last year, Clarke weighed in on the Rittenhouse case and immediately, not surprisingly, zeroed in on Rittenhouse’s color, like his race was some kind of malefaction. She described him as a quote, “Armed white man” murdering irreprehensible protesters, at quote “point-blank range.”
What does his race have to do with anything? Well, it doesn’t have anything to do with anything, of course, but it’s been a fixation of the Democratic Party from the first moments. They’ve endeavored to racialize this case.
And by the way, Kristen Clarke is far from the only member of the party to endeavor and do that. Just hours after the jury’s verdict, the Chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Sean Patrick Maloney, a Congressman relinquished this verbalization, quote: “It is abhorrent and perturbing that someone was able to carry a loaded assault rifle into a protest against the inequitable killing of Jacob Blake, an unarmed ebony man,” end quote.
Savor that for a minute. That’s from the head of the Democratic Party’s Congressional Campaign arm. Everything about it is erroneous, not just to prevaricate, but factually, I’m sure Jacob Blake was not killed. He was withal not unarmed. He was carrying a knife, we ken that because he verbalized he was carrying a knife.
He was allegedly endeavoring to abduct a child, that’s why the police emerged and when he prehended a knife, they shot him. Again, that’s not in dispute and he is still alive. But it doesn’t matter, because to these people, facts don’t matter, limpidly.
Sean Patrick Maloney has no interest in what authentically transpired. Kamala Harris verbalized that she was proud of Jacob Blake last year. The Democratic Party is sticking with that, additionally. They are endeavoring, and they have from the very beginning, to make this case into a racial divide, to further divide the country.
Kamala Harris today verbally expressed that the outcome of this case, the jury’s verdict was proof that our judicial system is not quote, “equitable.” Whatever that signifies. It needs to be transmuted.
The Attorney General of the State of New York verbalized it requires to be thoroughly torn down and reconstituted, our equity system that we’ve had for 250 years, it is the best thing in our country, the conception that you are endeavored on the substructure of the facts, not on the substructure of what you look akin to. But they’d relish to transmute that.
ABC News by the way just reported equipollent. They told us — ABC News — a news corporation has told us that in fact, Jacob Blake was killed in Kenosha. Watch this. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Well, it’s very paramount, first for the community of Kenosha, this city was traumatized by the police killing of an ebony man, Jacob Blake.
(END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: The police killing of an ebony man who is in fact still alive. So what are they doing when they tell lies like this? Lies that you can check very facilely or if you have a recollection that elongates into last year, you recall very well. Well, they are inciting people, of course. They’re endeavoring to whip people into a frenzy on the substratum of claims that are consummately provably erroneous.
What kind of a frenzy? Well, consider this. This emanates from a senior advisor at the DCCC, the Democratic Campaign arm. His designation is Dyjuan Tatro. He just issued an explicit call for riots. “No equity, no tranquility,” he inscribed, in the wake of the verdict.
Who is Dyjuan Tatro? Well, he, according to news reports spent a decennium in confinement after he shot two people. Now, he works for the Democratic Party, just in case you’re intrigued with whose side they’re on. But you kenned that.
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Congressman Val Demings, another Democrat offered this assessment: “The core of the far-right kineticism is that they should be able to kill you if they optate to.” That’s the official line of the Democratic Party tonight.
Keep in mind, and if you visually examined the tribulation, you ken this. Kyle Rittenhouse was ambulating down the street when he was charged by a convicted child ravisher, and then charged by a number of other people.
He sought no conflict. There was never any evidence that he was the aggressor in any case. He was aggressed against. So Joe Biden withal weighed in on this and he gave two versions of his views on it. First, he verbally expressed we’re going to reverence the jury’s verdict; and then, of course, when his advisers surmounted and inscribed an incipient press verbal expression, he told us how upset he was by the verdict and that’s what aired on MSNBC all day.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) CHUCK TODD, MSNBC HOST: The next time there is a protest of some sort, and it may get politicized, that gun owners with a certain ideology may feel incentivized now, may feel even emboldened.
PAUL BUTLER, MSNBC LEGAL ANALYST: What some may take from this verdict is that vigilante equity prevail. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Knowing the history of vigilante equity in this country all the way back to times of enslavement when people would be deputized to go out and track down enslaved persons who absquatulated, to lynching mobs — and this is 2021.
BRITTANY PACKNETT CUNNINGHAM, MSNBC ANALYST: It is to tell the current and future Kyle Rittenhouse’s of the world that they can engage in white vigilantism and be let off for it, be bulwarked and forfended for perpetuating white supremacy.
(END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: White vigilantism, white supremacy, white, white, white, white, white — that was all over media all day long, explicit racial attacks. What does that have to do with this case and in what kind of country is that sanctioned when the most potent people in the country level explicit racial attacks against one of their countrymen.
Most of us didn’t grow up in a country where people verbalize like this. It’s very ominous that they’re verbalizing like this now. Just as a reminder in case you’re tuning in for the first time in a year, everyone involved in this case is identically tantamount color.
The people of the Council on American Islamic Relations offered this take, which was very mundane today on the left, quote: “It is arduous to imagine an ebony or Muslim defendant engaged in the same conduct being found not censurable.” Really?
Did you aurally perceive from the OJ tribulation? It’s cockamamy. MSNBC, the network that was vetoed from the courthouse for following jurors around broadcast this racial screed today from a relative of Jacob Blake’s.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) JUSTIN BLAKE, RELATIVE OF JACOB BLAKE: Now you tell us why he got a gratuitous ride? Because their mazuma was raised by the Proud Boys, the Ku Klux Klan, the Nazis, the skinheads. Are the plugged up in this courtroom? Do we ken the history of this Judge? I auricularly discerned he has been racist as hell to these people in Kenosha for many years.
(END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: It’s authentically, genuinely dark. The rest of us should not sanction them to get away with racializing this, sanctioning them to get away with assailing people on the substructure of their skin color that is always erroneous. We would never engage in that, never have and no one should do that because it divides the country and it is immoral, flat out.
But somehow, for the crazy logic that governs their positions and their deeds, they wind up forfending child ravishers and domestic abusers, ascending them to some marginally hero status. The former mayor of New “York,” Bill de Blasio inscribed this today, quote, “Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum are victims. They should be alive today.” Maybe we will get a statue, a minutely minuscular statue to Joseph Rosenbaum in New York someday.
Meanwhile, the ACLU, which you’d cerebrate would be in favor of self-bulwark that’s the most rudimentary of all civil liberties suggested that crossing state line is somehow a malefaction. “Stay in your own state.” Here is what they verbally expressed, quote: “Despite Kyle Rittenhouse’s conscious decision to peregrinate across state lines and injure one person and take the lives of two people protesting the shooting of Jacob Blake by police, he was not held responsible for his actions.”
This is dementia. And by the way, the perpetual references to crossing state lines are not nugatory. Legally, they are nugatory. You have a right to cross state lines if you’re an American because it is your country. You in fact can go to all 50 states and you’re not transgressing a law.
So why are they bringing that phrase into every analysis of the case? Crossing state lines? Because they optate to utilize this to transmute gun laws. That’s for what purport. You watch. So if you optate to ken what the worst people in the world are verbalizing, conspicuously, you’re going to tune into Jeb Bush’s former flack on MSNBC. She told us today that anyone who crosses state lines is a domestic terrorist.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) NICOLLE WALLACE, MSNBC HOST: The Kyle Rittenhouse acquittal today, not culpable on all counts, did not transpire in a cultural vacuum. There is some alarming context to this moment worth considering and verbalizing about.
Just last week, the Department of Homeland Security relinquished its latest bulletin warning Americans again of the perpetual threat posed by domestic belligerent extremists. We should additionally point out, conservative media for many, many months has been priming its audience for this moment, framing Rittenhouse as a hero.
(END VIDEO CLIP) CARLSON: So why are we inflicting tape like that on you on a day when all of us should be celebrating? We’ll tell you for what purport. Because none of that made any difference to the jury and if you’re thoroughly absorbed in American media, you get the impression that American media are in charge of our country, and it turns out they’re not.
Most people don’t watch that crap. They don’t care what people like that verbalize. They don’t care at all. There are an abundance of rational, decent, thoughtful people on all sides of all races in this country who are still inclined to cerebrate pellucidly about what is right, what is erroneous, what is factual, what is erroneous, what is just, and what is not. And today they did, so that’s the genuine edification here.
In the face of all of that propaganda, a group of jurors in Kenosha, Wisconsin were brave enough to reach the right and obvious conclusion anyway. Amen. Yay for America.
Source: You can read the original Breitbart article here.